Those who have : Chapter 4
The prevalence of children within the temple and among the wealthy in Havenbrook starkly contrasts with the demographic makeup of the lower castes. It paints a portrait of disparity not just in wealth but also in generational representation and prospects for the future.
In the opulent confines of the temple, the presence of children is notably scarce. The elite clergy, focused on maintaining their status and power, often defer or abstain from parenthood, prioritizing their roles within the temple hierarchy. Their pursuit of influence and authority tends to overshadow desires for familial legacies, resulting in a diminished number of young ones within these affluent circles.
Similarly, among the wealthy families residing in the upper echelons of society, the presence of children is relatively limited. Factors such as the pursuit of material success, societal obligations, and the focus on maintaining prestige often lead to smaller families or delayed parenthood. The pursuit of careers and societal status takes precedence over expanding families, contributing to a reduced representation of younger generations within these privileged circles.
Conversely, within the lower castes and the impoverished segments of the city, the prevalence of children is notably higher. Families in these communities often have more children due to various socio-economic factors, including cultural norms, lack of access to contraception or education, and the need for additional support in old age. The younger demographics in these areas result in a visibly different age distribution compared to the temple and the affluent neighborhoods.
This disparity in the age distribution between the privileged and the marginalized reflects a broader societal divide within Havenbrook. The lower representation of children among the affluent class and within the temple compounds the chasm between the elites and the common folk, underscoring not just a wealth divide but also a disparity in generational representation and future prospects for the city.
In the opulent confines of the temple, the presence of children is notably scarce. The elite clergy, focused on maintaining their status and power, often defer or abstain from parenthood, prioritizing their roles within the temple hierarchy. Their pursuit of influence and authority tends to overshadow desires for familial legacies, resulting in a diminished number of young ones within these affluent circles.
Similarly, among the wealthy families residing in the upper echelons of society, the presence of children is relatively limited. Factors such as the pursuit of material success, societal obligations, and the focus on maintaining prestige often lead to smaller families or delayed parenthood. The pursuit of careers and societal status takes precedence over expanding families, contributing to a reduced representation of younger generations within these privileged circles.
Conversely, within the lower castes and the impoverished segments of the city, the prevalence of children is notably higher. Families in these communities often have more children due to various socio-economic factors, including cultural norms, lack of access to contraception or education, and the need for additional support in old age. The younger demographics in these areas result in a visibly different age distribution compared to the temple and the affluent neighborhoods.
This disparity in the age distribution between the privileged and the marginalized reflects a broader societal divide within Havenbrook. The lower representation of children among the affluent class and within the temple compounds the chasm between the elites and the common folk, underscoring not just a wealth divide but also a disparity in generational representation and future prospects for the city.
Comments